Note: This rubric is used assess organizational capacity of new incoming grant applications.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | Rating 1-5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Organization / Team | New organization with little to no history of successful execution. | Early stage organization (>1 yr old) with emerging leadership. | Experienced organization and leadership but <5 years old. No significant experience with proposed work. | High capacity and experienced organization (>5 years old) with proven leadership. | High capacity and experienced organization (>5 years old) with proven leadership, and skills to execute proposed work. | |
Financial Health | Evidence of unstable financial organization or poor fiscal management. | Brand new organization. | Newer organization with <$2M budget, highly dependent on small # of funders. | Financially stable organization with >3 years of consistent growth. | Highly financially resilient organization with diverse revenue and stable financial growth. Grant <10% of total annual budget. | |
External Dependencies | ||||||
(Partnerships / Ecosystem / operating environment / dependencies) | Organization has signaled no interest in exploring partnerships or awareness of external dependencies that may improve project outcomes. | Applicant has expressed desire to partner with key stakeholders but has not identified them. | Applicant is aware of key partnerships and external dependencies needed and has begun to engage them. | Applicant has secured advisors, MOUs or other soft commitments from key stakeholders or implementation partners. | Applicant has secured formal partnerships with a diverse group of key stakeholders and additional engaged funder partnerships. | |
Program Structure | New program design with limited to no evidence. | New program design with early evidence of success. | New program design with strong evidence of success. | Existing proven product or service but changed slightly by location, population, or topic. | Proven product or service with clear evidence of outcomes. |